HIGH GROUND / LINK ASSESSMENT
Seven signals. One evidence-led assessment. Check whether a backlink opportunity fits your niche, not just its headline metrics.
01 / THE OPPORTUNITY
THE FRAMEWORK
Scores use the supplied HighGround rubric. The overall result is calculated in code, not decided by the AI. A full grade requires evidence for all seven categories.
Niche relevance using actual content, ranking URLs, keywords and topic concentration, not keyword count alone.
Documented numeric bands: keyword breadth 40%, ranking-page breadth 35%, estimated traffic 25%, in the stated market; calculated in code, not by AI.
Quality and diversity of referring domains, with spam and sample limits.
Editorial/commercial linking in bounded homepage and observed article samples, citing the actual page used, not a sitewide crawl.
Verified proposed page or explicitly labelled provider-environment article sample, not a guarantee of the purchased placement.
Functioning publisher, identity, authors, history and contact signals; self-declarations are not external validation.
Source rarity 40%, source quality 25%, editorial uniqueness 20%, competitor scarcity 15%, using automatically discovered comparable domains.
Good / balanced publisher standard. Nearest whole number, .5 upward, applied to Gap and final weighted HG Score. Original supplied examples are retained unchanged as reference data. AI-assisted scores are opinions based on available evidence, not guarantees of rankings or link value.